By Shibani Mahtani
August 1, 2020 at 3:05 a.m. GMT+9 The Washington Post
HONG KONG — The Hong Kong government said Friday it would delay legislative council elections for a year because of the coronavirus pandemic, undermining one of the few partially democratic institutions left in the Chinese territory as Beijing tightens its grip.
The decision to put the Sept. 6 elections on hold — unprecedented in the city’s political history since its handover from Britain to China in 1997 — was widely seen as another direct blow to Hong Kong’s autonomy after Beijing imposed a new security law that sharply expanded powers to quash dissent in Hong Kong.
It also closed off one of the few remaining forums for Hong Kong voters to express their voice. The legislative council races loomed as a potential slap against China and its stunning moves to curb Hong Kong’s political freedoms after a waves of pro-democracy protests last year.
The council elections were expected to bring a significant show of support for opponents of Beijing’s increasing controls. In advance, Hong Kong officials disqualified a dozen pro-democracy candidates.
Now, Hong Kong’s chief executive, Carrie Lam, said the makeup of the 70-seat council will be decided by Beijing until new elections are held.
“This reflects that they — not us — are in fear, in fear of the people and of their voices,” said Alvin Yeung, leader of the opposition Civic Party and one of the disqualified candidates.
Lam said in a news conference that she was invoking emergency powers to postpone the vote, calling it the most “difficult decision” she has had to make since the onset of the virus here in January.
“We have made the decision to postpone the election for one year,” Lam said, after spending half an hour laying out her government’s response to the pandemic and the potential health risks of holding the vote. Because of the pandemic, “we would not be able to meet the requirements of an open and fair election,” she said.
In response to reporters’ questions, she added: “There is absolutely no political agenda.” The postponement, Lam said, was supported by Beijing since it is in the “public interest.”
Unconvinced, opposition politicians and observers said the moves are designed to stack the political system with those loyal to the Chinese Communist Party and snuff out even moderate political opposition in Hong Kong.
“They have basically redefined their definition of their enemies, and from one red line, we now have a few. Those red lines have become very thick,” said the opposition leader Yeung.
Pro-democracy candidates swept a majority of seats in local elections in November, a vote widely seen as an endorsement of their movement and a repudiation of the Beijing-allied elites.
Over the past year, pro-democracy legislators have tried to stall or vote down bills, including Lam’s proposal that would have allowed extraditions to mainland China and one that would criminalize mockery of the Chinese national anthem.
Lam herself acknowledged that the elections were the “biggest” in Hong Kong, with 4.4 million voters registered. Having so many people gathered, she said, poses a “great risk,” and registered voters who live in mainland China may not be able to travel into the city to cast their votes.
Countries such as Singapore and South Korea have held elections amid the covid-19 outbreak, which was severe in both places. In the 21 days since Singapore’s election, the city-state, which has a population density similar to Hong Kong’s, has not seen a jump in covid-19 cases, and daily community transmissions are in fact down to the single digits. Epidemiologists have noted that Hong Kong has begun to see gains in fighting this third wave of infections, and they predicted that daily cases, which have been a little over 100 in recent days, will likely drop in about four to six weeks.
In Washington, White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said Friday that the election delay was “only the most recent in a growing list of broken promises” by Beijing on Hong Kong’s autonomy.
“This action undermines the democratic processes and freedoms that have underpinned Hong Kong’s prosperity,” McEnany said. On Thursday, President Trump proposed a delay to the November presidential election, claiming without evidence that widespread mail balloting would be a “catastrophic disaster.” Republican leaders quickly said no such U.S. election delay was possible.
In other fallout from Hong Kong’s move, Germany joined Britain and other nations in suspending its extradition agreement with Hong Kong. A statement from Germany’s foreign minister, Heiko Maas, called it a “further infringement on the rights of Hong Kong’s citizens.”
Analysts have pointed out, too, that the Hong Kong government could have delayed the vote by a shorter period of several months and put in place a system such as postal or electronic voting. Other institutions of government, including courts that are currently prosecuting thousands of people arrested in pro-democracy protests last year, continue to be open as usual.
“Delaying it for a whole year is clearly overreach,” said Antony Dapiran, a lawyer and writer on Hong Kong politics. “It gives them time to suppress the opposition for another year.”
Sophie Richardson, China director at Human Rights Watch, said the move follows a pattern in which the pandemic has been used as cover to suppress political dissidents in mainland China. Hong Kong, she said, has long been a standout in the administration of elections, which are conducted in an open, orderly way.
“Covid has presented a remarkably convenient excuse, but also a very shallow one,” Richardson said. “But what efforts have gone into considering alternatives to postponing the elections for a year?”
The disqualified candidates included prominent activists such as Joshua Wong, political newcomers including a former journalist and organizers of pro-democracy protests. Reasons cited included opposition to government policies and an opinion piece written by Wong in The Washington Post. The candidates, officials said, could not be trusted to uphold the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s mini-constitution.
“Clearly, this is the largest electoral fraud in Hong Kong’s history,” Wong said in a tweet.
The reasons cited by the government, Dapiran added, show that the national security law has in effect been much broader than expected, since it can now be used to disqualify anyone who does not explicitly support it.
“They are using the law to essentially find any pretense to outlaw political opposition wholesale, and disqualify as many as they can,” he said. “It now seems like any pretense of democracy has been taken away.”
Tiffany Liang in Hong Kong and Loveday Morris in Berlin contributed to this report.