The Washington Post
By David Nakamura December 6 at 8:46 PM
President Obama said Sunday that the threat of terrorism to the United States has evolved into a new phase in the wake of recent attacks in Paris and San Bernardino, Calif., but he vowed that the nation will ultimately defeat the Islamic State and other militant groups.
“The threat from terrorism is real, but we will overcome it,” Obama said during a 14-minute Oval Office address. Using an acronym for the group, he declared: “We will destroy ISIL.”
Obama, who has struggled to calm public fears, hoped the rare prime-time address would help reassure an uneasy nation after a series of deadly terrorist attacks. Aides said he made the decision to speak directly to the nation — only the third time he has used the Oval Office for such a speech — late last week and worked on his remarks through the weekend.
The president said the effort to defeat terrorists will “not depend on tough talk or abandoning our values or giving in to fear. Instead, we will prevail by being strong and smart, resilient and relentless.”
Obama urged the public not to react with fear that could flame divisive rhetoric against the Muslim community and, the president believes, provide ballast to the Islamic State’s propaganda campaign.
“Let’s make sure we never forget what make us exceptional,” he said. “Let’s not forget that freedom is more powerful than fear.”
In his address, Obama attempted to clearly spell out the extent of the terrorist threats to the United States, explain his approach to fighting extremists in the Middle East and their propaganda on the Internet, and caution the American people against reacting in ways that Obama believes could exacerbate the problem.
But the challenge for Obama, who has been steadfast that he will not dramatically change course despite the recent attacks, has been to convince the public that an effort he has said will take years to destroy the Islamic State can keep the country safe in the meantime.
His address prompted blistering attacks from those who have been clamoring for a new and more forceful strategy against the Islamic State.
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) criticized Obama’s address for failing, in his view, to lay out a “comprehensive strategy to confront and defeat ISIS.”
In a statement, Ryan said: “Until we hear from the president what more can be done — with our military, our intelligence-gathering, and our international partners — we will remain one step behind our enemy. This is not just the next president’s problem. It is our problem, and we must confront it today.”
[Obama’s anti-terror agenda faces stiff odds in Congress]
Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, a Republican presidential contender, echoed that view and accused the president of pursuing policies that have made the world less safe. “It is time for a dramatic shift in both foreign and national security policy,” Cruz said. “The recent attacks in Paris and San Bernardino have further confirmed that radical Islamic terrorists are at war with the West.”
The president has ruled out deploying significant U.S. military troops to the region, relying instead on airstrikes from a U.S.-led coalition of 65 nations and providing assistance to local forces in Iraq and Syria. He recently authorized 50 members of the Special Forces to Syria to help advise rebel fighters and ramped up intelligence sharing with allies.
“We have stepped up this effort since the attacks in Paris,” Obama said. “We are constantly evaluating our strategy to determine when additional steps are necessary to get the job done.”
But he also pressed Congress to help the cause by approving a legislative authorization of the use of military force in Iraq and Syria and to approve new laws that would bar suspected terrorists who are banned from flying to buy guns in the United States. A bill to do the former has languished on Capitol Hill, and a bill to the latter was defeated in the Senate last week.
“What we can do, and must do, is make it harder for them to kill,” Obama said.
Obama offered no new strategies during his address, but he highlighted new commitments from France, Germany and the United Kingdom to step up their own aid to fight and airstrikes against the Islamic State in recent weeks.
For Obama, the decision to deliver his first prime-time address since 2010 in the august setting of the Oval Office highlights the concern in the West Wing that terrorism fears will overtake the rest of Obama’s agenda in his final year in office.
Obama and his advisers have pointed to success in some areas of Iraq, where the Islamic State has lost territory. But the string of recent attacks claimed by the terrorist group — including the downing of a Russian airliner over Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula — have alarmed the public and led Republicans to charge that Obama has underestimated the group.
“President Obama’s declaration tonight that his policies are working was strange,” said another GOP presidential contender, retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson. “Strange that it took four days from the attack to respond and even more strange that somehow the attack on our soil is proof his policies are working. One must wonder who has contained who.”
The setbacks have put Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, in the uncomfortable position of being asked to second-guess Obama.
On ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday, the former secretary of state said: “We have to fight in the air, fight on the ground and fight them on the Internet. We have to do everything we can with our friends and partners around the world. That’s what we’ll hear from the president, to intensify the current strategy.”
She added that they must also take additional steps, including asking Facebook, YouTube and Twitter not to allow Islamic State fighters to post messages appealing to potential sympathizers around the globe.
But, she emphasized, “I don’t think there should be American combat troops. . . . That would make things worse.”
[Clinton: U.S. is ‘not winning’ against Islamic State]
Obama has cautioned the public not to overreact, and he has denounced rhetoric from some Republicans, including Cruz and Jeb Bush, another GOP presidential nominee, who have called on the administration to halt the influx of Muslim refugees from Syria.
The president also discussed the need for the public to avoid creating the perception that the United States is at war with Islam, which Obama believes would help the Islamic State recruit foreign fighters and radicalize sympathizers in the United States and elsewhere.
“We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam. That, too, is what groups like ISIL want,” Obama said. “ISIL does not speak for Islam. They are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death. And they account for a tiny fraction of more than a billion Muslims around the world, including millions of patriotic Muslim-Americans who reject their hateful ideology.”
But Obama also called on Muslim communities to “continue working with us to decisively and unequivocally reject the hateful ideology” of groups such as the Islamic State and al-Qaeda.
Obama used the beginning of his remarks to discuss the changing nature of the terrorist threat. Tashfeen Malik, one of the shooters in the San Bernardino attacks that killed 14 people last week, pledged allegiance to the Islamic State on social media during the attack, authorities said. But there is no evidence that she or her husband, Syed Rizwan Farook, the other perpetrator, were operating under the direct guidance of the militant group.
Authorities have said that such lone-wolf attacks, in which perpetrators become “self-radicalized,” are among the most difficult for U.S. intelligence agencies to detect and prevent.
“The terrorist threat has evolved into a new phase,” Obama said. “As we’ve become better at preventing complex multifaceted attacks like 9/11, terrorists turn to less complicated acts of violence like the mass shootings that are all too common in our society.”
Chico Harlan, Elise Viebeck and Katie Zezima contributed to this report.