CNN 旭川時事英語研究会

WikiLeaks: Chinese attacks on Google came from the top

投稿日:

旭川時事英語研究会の勉強会も、いよいよ今日で終わりです。
2010年最後の勉強会のtextです。12月20日のtextは、中国の関与するgoogleへの攻撃を取り上げました。皆さん、今日も宜しく!

旭川時事英語研究会の忘年会も楽しかったですね!紅一点のモントレー英語倶楽部の野月さん、緑ヶ丘英語サークルの野村さん、浅香さん、そして工藤さん、本当に楽しい方たちです。二次会ではカラオケで盛り上がりました。皆さん、歌が上手なんですよ^^v

By Tim Lister, CNN
December 6, 2010 — Updated 1518 GMT (2318 HKT)

Cables released by WikiLeaks show Chinese officials worried about Google links to stories about Tiananmen Square

(CNN) — Several U.S. diplomatic cables obtained by WikiLeaks show growing anxiety among Chinese officials about citizens getting uncensored online content through Google — with one Politburo member reportedly angry to find negative comments about himself online.

In May 2009, Google approached the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, according to one leaked cable, “to discuss recent pressure by the Chinese government to censor the company’s Chinese website.”

Chinese officials were unhappy that the sanitized google.cn, which was established by Google in 2006, contained a link to the uncensored google.com, and appeared especially sensitive about the issue because of the imminent 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square protests.

The redacted cable, dated May 18 and written by Economic Minister Counselor Robert Luke, says U.S. diplomats had been told that “the root of the problem was China’s Politburo Standing Committee member (name redacted).” Later it says: “(name redacted) allegedly entered his own name and found results critical of him….He also noticed the link from google.cn’s homepage to google.com, which (redacted) reportedly believes is an ‘illegal site.'”

In another apparent reference to the Politburo member, the cable says he “believes Google is a ‘tool’ of the USG being used to ‘foment peaceful revolution in China.'”

The New York Times, which had advance access to the cables obtained by WikiLeaks, says that official is Li Changchun, who is a member of the Chinese Communist Party’s Standing Politburo Committee — its highest body — and runs the Politburo’s propaganda apparatus. He subsequently asked three ministries to demand that Google end its “illegal activities,” according to the cable.

At the same time the Chinese government was taking commercial steps against Google, instructing state-owned telecom firms to stop doing business with the company — “a hard blow because mobile Internet is Google’s ‘big bet in China,'” the cable added.

Google refused to remove the link on its Chinese site, and its lawyers “found no legal basis for China’s demands.”

The dilemma for the company was that it risked “losing the Chinese market in retaliation for maintaining its integrity and brand,” the cable said.

Google had entered the Chinese market on three principles: it would never disclose to the Chinese government any personal information about its users or their search habits; it would always include a disclosure notice to identify when search results had been removed due to censorship; and it would always provide an uncensored, U.S.-hosted site, subject to U.S. law.

Two months later — in July 2009 — Google’s servers were “virally infected” for 24 hours, amid claims that Google was failing to filter out pornographic sites. The embassy’s sources, says a cable from that month, believe “the real reason for the government’s wrath is the company’s refusal to remove a link to google.com from the google.cn website.”

The cable continued, apparently quoting a Google official,: “(redacted) said the negative press coverage and service outages have caused the company to lose market share…..(redacted) said that, faced with the continual difficulties of doing business in China, the company may even consider pulling out of the market.”

The attacks on Google servers continued, with the company reporting in January of this year that it had been the victim of a sophisticated cyber attack originating from China. It said it also discovered that the “Gmail accounts of dozens of human rights activists connected with China were being routinely accessed by third parties.” So it began redirecting users visiting google.cn to the uncensored content of google.com.hk.

A US. cable written from Beijing after that cyber attack said: “A well-placed contact claims that the Chinese government coordinated the recent intrusions of Google systems. According to our contact, the closely held operations were directed at the Politburo Standing Committee level.”

The cable noted: “An appeal to nationalism seems to be the Chinese government’s chosen option to counter Google’s demand to provide unfiltered web content.” An unnamed Chinese contact “stated that PRC operations against Google were ‘one hundred percent’ political in nature and had nothing to do with removing Google, with its minority market share, as a competitor to Chinese search engines.”

The cable also suggested the move might backfire on the Chinese authorities, apparently citing a Chinese contact. “All of a sudden, (redacted) continued, Baidu (a state-owned internet search engine) looked like a boring state-owned enterprise while Google ‘seems very attractive, like the forbidden fruit.'”

However, the cables suggest that the Chinese leadership — and specifically the State Council Information Office — believed that the internet in China could be controlled. “Through the Google incident and other increased controls and surveillance, like real-name registration, they reached a conclusion: The Web is fundamentally controllable,” according to one source quoted in a cable.

Long before the crisis in 2009, Google was running into hostility from Chinese officials.

In November 2007, China asked the U.S. government to reduce the resolution of Google Earth images of military, nuclear and other sensitive sites in China.

Chinese officials warned of “possible ‘grave consequences’ if terrorists exploit the information to harm China.” A diplomat at the embassy said he would report the Chinese request to Washington, but noted that Google is a private company.

Other cables suggest close ties between Chinese state enterprises and private hackers in China. According to a cable from the U.S. secretary of state’s office written in June 2009, the China Information Technology Security Center “has recruited Chinese hackers in support of nationally-funded ‘network attack scientific research projects.'”

One such enterprise — TOPSEC — employed “a known Chinese hacker, Lin Yong (a.k.a. Lion and owner of the Honker Union of China), as senior security service engineer to manage security service and training.” Another was “known to affiliate with XFocus, one of the few Chinese hacker groups known to develop exploits to new vulnerabilities in a short period of time.”

The cable concludes: “While links between top Chinese companies and the PRC are not uncommon, it illustrates the PRC’s use of its ‘private sector’ in support of governmental information warfare objectives, especially in its ability to gather, process, and exploit information.”

Sponsored Links




Sponsored Links




-CNN, 旭川時事英語研究会
-, ,

執筆者:


comment

関連記事

Israel’s Netanyahu expresses shock over ‘despicable murder’ of Palestinian teen

旭川時事英語研究会の宮口です。 さて、今日の課題はパレスチナで起きている「憎しみの連鎖」についてCNNから取り上げてみました。今日も張り切って勉強しましょうね。 By Kareem Khadder, …

After Antonin Scalia’s Death, Fierce Battle Lines Emerge

旭川時事英語研究会の宮口です。皆さん、お元気ですか? 昨日は暖気で雨が降り続き、夜には雨に変わりました。今日は一転、寒さがぶり返して吹雪模様の大荒れの天気が続いています。今夜の勉強会、皆さん車の運転に …

Dressed only in underwear, castaway appeared on islands weak and hungry

旭川時事英語研究会 By Suzanne Chutaro. Miguel Marquez and Sarah Aarthun, CNN February 10, 2014 — Update …

Why the world is wary of China’s ‘great wall of sand’ in the sea

皆さん、こんばんは!旭川時事英語研究会の宮口です。 今日もCNNから記事を引用させて頂きます。今日もPM7:00からです。 Clive Schofield Updated 0716 GMT (1416 …

The world is closer to having a real weapon to fight Ebola

旭川時事英語研究会の宮口です。今日は世界中が開発にしのぎを削っているエボラ出血熱の治療薬についてCNNから抜粋しました。一日も早いワクチンの開発が期待されています。 Jen Christensen, …

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links



search